The elimination of state funding necessary to support the Mountain Communities, sets the regions in a difficult position because they have to bear the costs of management and staff represent a commitment is not insignificant for their own budgets. Since the Mountain Communities should not pay the one-sided and irresponsible choice of the central government to cut funds allocated thereto, the issue must be addressed seriously looking at this that they can make to the territory.
E 'at a glance the first finding of the Regional Council Massimiliano Scrabble in discussions of the regional law of reorganization of the Mountain Communities, which was held on Tuesday 15 March.
" The structural deficit which, oftentimes, the regions are responsible" says Councillor , 'services that abide by the same mountain communities, put them in serious condition to be reorganized, but not certainly be abolished. Beyond this, the need to put their hand to a reorganization, must start from the belief that the role for the territory of competence, is more dynamic and purposeful, than hitherto they have not done.
If we continue to support them simply because we do not know where to place the staff, then we will create new boxes that do not serve the purpose. Therefore, subject to the rights of employees of the same mountain communities to maintain their employment status, safeguarding before any initiative to reorganize their place and their income, we try to make the idea of \u200b\u200breform can be more streamlined and less costly for regional banks.
For example, in the Commission proposal on the establishment of a regional agency that is supposed to represent the seat suited to coordinate and leverage development policies, and in particular in the strategic areas of mountain agriculture and environmental resources, I am not convinced at all, because I think a new sub-regional bandwagon, with more political and electoral purposes and functionality in order to which was designed .
Councillor Scarabeo order, introduced its own proposal: "Who , most local authorities such as municipalities, they know the territory, demands and peculiarities that can handle even indirectly associated with a financial contribution from the region?
since they lacked the organizational capacity to carry out recommendations and actions for the promotion of new businesses, business support operating in its territory, preservation and environmental policy, develop tourism, mountain farming operations? I do not believe local authorities are not lacking the quality to carry on a discourse of development of areas of competence, the more so as associates, say that lack the funds that the region of Molise was to bind over the years, to reach collect the results of a serious political and economic development of mountain areas.
Without wishing to demagoguery, I do not think that a new figure, placed between the region and local authorities can meet the real needs related to transportation, unemployment, school reorganization, the depopulation of the inland areas, because if this is true, the region has done little.
More effective could be the idea of \u200b\u200ba new institutional design, attached to the Union of Municipalities for homogeneous areas or to a form of joint management of areas of competence by the municipalities themselves, which also includes the mountain communities, without making them disappear, making them an active part of the initiative, a continuation of the role already played individually.
Many local entities, have already expressed a positive way and this really could mean, in addition to maintaining services, including a new, different way of thinking and planning the future of their territories.
goes itself, that any initiative related to the optimization, starting with the operating costs for end to all the other directed to the preservation and development of areas of competence, would become a firm commitment of local members, who better than others can rise to the role controller to direct the activities of the mountain communities.
Basically nothing would change in its organization, on what the municipalities already pay some financial services provided by mountain communities, and the cost of personnel for the reorganization law in question, Article 11 already provides that staff of the Community would absorbed in the region, local authorities and / or any of the Unions Municipalities, with or without the new agency .
Councillor beetle finally concluded his speech. "And 'obvious that the subsequent restructuring and management control by the associated communities, would be less expensive than a new regional body to be charged, but I would like to return, once again, employees of the mountain communities, the subject of" destruction "incentive for early retirement and for which, apart from what is decided must be kept in mind their future employment and income .
0 comments:
Post a Comment